Thursday, November 17, 2011

The Twilight Movies - Helped Or Hurt The Books?

Grab the Totally Twilight Button!





The Twilight novels were released between October 2005 and August 2008. In that time, they managed to find legions of extraordinarily devoted fans. Just a few months later - November 2008 - the first Twilight movie was released. Where before Twilight was popular among YA book lovers, after the movie was released, it was all Twilight, all the time. People screaming, crying, and fainting as they professed their love for Edward/Rob (which one did they really care for?). Everywhere you went - the gym, the beach, the bus - people were reading Twilight books. Each movie release and even each DVD release was an international event. The books, the characters, and the actors all became controversial - you loved or hated them - very little middle ground.

For those of us who are fans of the books (whether in addition to the movies or not), the hoopla about the Twilight franchise can be distressing. Unlike a lot of people, I am a big fan of the movies as well as being a big fan of the books. I'm also quite into the actors - although I'm not about to tattoo Rob's face on my arm or anything.

But it makes me wonder - would Twilight the franchise be better off without the movies? What have the movies taken away from the series and what have they added to it?

Have the Twilight movies helped or hurt the books?


Helped

1) New Readers: The movies have brought legions of new readers to the Twilight books. Teenagers and adults (both men and women) who would not have stepped near a bookstore or the YA section otherwise have read the Twilight series because of the movies. Perhaps they loved the movies, they dream of having Rob's babies, they hate the movies, they're curious about the controversy...whatever. The key thing is that the movies have brought new people to the books. Some of these people hated the books, but some loved them. I am in favor of anything that gets people reading more and the movies have undoubtedly accomplished that.

2) Visualization: You can argue - and I will - that this is a good and bad thing. On the good side, I love having images to place alongside the words. The Twilight world is much richer now that I've seen the movies. In my head, Rob, Kristen, and Taylor are Edward, Bella, and Jacob. Since I read the books a little before the movies came out, I initially formed my own images for the characters. Kristin in particular looks almost exactly as I envisioned Bella. Rob and Taylor are close enough that I happily replaced their faces with my imagined characters. Aside from the characters' looks, other visual aspects of the movies made the books richer: the gorgeous northwest scenery, the clothes and jewelry that highlighted the characters' personalities, the facial expressions that helped convey emotions better than words, and more.

3) Good Movies: The Twilight movies are not perfect by a long shot. But here's the deal...they could be so much worse! Apparently, the first script that was put out there (long before Summit and Catherine Hardwicke signed on to do the film) had Bella as a high school track star and Edward and the Cullens as goth fang-bearing vamps. While that may have made an interesting stand-alone film, if Twilight is going to be made into a movie, I want it as close to the books as possible. Catherine Hardwicke started off the series right. She was truly passionate about the books and wanted to honor Twilight as best she could in the first film. Melissa Rosenberg was on board too. The other directors have remained true to the spirit of the books. I also like how much they've involved Stephenie in the filmmaking process. They could have completely ignored the author. Like the Harry Potter films, the Twilight films valued the books.

The acting is definitely not Oscar-worthy in any of the films, but I like seeing the actors improve noticeably with each film. It's like watching them grow up on screen. Additionally, the main characters are not particularly emotive in the books, so Kristen and Rob's somewhat stand-offish, awkward performances are not out of place. With each film, there are scenes that I'm disappointed with or omissions that I miss, but on the whole it honors the book upon which it is based and even enriches it. The films are good enough to steer a lot of people toward the books.

Hurt

1) Haters: Attention can be a double edged sword. The popularity of the Twilight movies has garnered legions of fans to the series, but also tons of people who hate it. Their reasons vary. Perhaps they thought the movies were poorly acted and poorly written. Perhaps the movies led them to read the books and they hated them. Perhaps they think the movies and books are anti-feminist. Perhaps they like to hate on anything that is "popular."

It's become cool and sophisticated to raz on Twilight. Sort of like how a 4 year old is obsessed with Barney, but that same child as a 6 year old is convinced that Barney is for babies. Complaining about Twilight's popularity or pedestrian nature is a way to show that you're hip. That's not to say that some people don't have legitimate reasons to dislike Twilight, but the knee-jerk reaction is too often to ridicule the franchise. Even bloggers are sometimes embarrassed to admit that they're fans.

2) Gossip: The actors are so strongly identified with their corresponding Twilight characters that their personal lives bleed into the franchise. Are Rob and Kristen dating? Are they going to get married and have a mutant child? Is Kristen cheating on Rob with Taylor? Are all the Twilight actors best friends or do they hate each other? Ooh! Ashley is dating Joe Jonas. Look - there's Ashley and Kellan heading to the gym for the thousandth time. Nikki got married super quick to an American Idol reject. And more. I love the gossip, but it can be easy to forget the the actors are not the book characters, particularly since none of them had big pre-Twilight careers. It's a distraction from the books.

3) Visualization Part 2: One of the most enjoyable parts of reading is the forced imagination. Sights and sounds are described through words only. The experience of reading is a joint action between the author's prose and the reader's interpretation. A movie changes all that. You sit there while sights and sounds are created for you. When the movie is interpreting a book you've already read, it inevitably clashes with your imagination. I said above that Rob, Kristen, and Taylor all look pretty similar to how I envisioned their characters. Unfortunately, the other Cullens - particularly Ashley Greene and Kellan Lutz - look nothing like how I imagine them. Plus, the costume designers can't make up their mind about the characters' hair. From the previous. Carlisle's hair looks particularly horrific in Breaking Dawn. The films get most of the scenery right, except for the Cullen house. The modern northwestern architecture is beautiful in its own right, but where is the white three-story Victorian? That's the house I want to see. When the movies continuously portray characters badly it detracts away from the essence of the film and makes it look amateur.

4. Bad Movies: Plenty of people ridicule the Twilight films for being lousy and assume that carries over to the books. I congratulate the Twilight directors and Melissa Rosenberg for trying so hard to be loyal to the books. But sometimes books don't translate well to screen. There are numerous lines that were cheesy cute in the books but are cheesy cheesy in the films. Other times, I wonder why they aren't closer to the books. Why, for example, don't we see Vera's baby in Rosalie's flashback scene in Eclipse? Or why don't we see the scene of when Alice and Jasper met?

As I said above, I don't have a problem with Kristen and Rob's acting, or the other characters, even though it's not the best. Kristen's ticky awkward Bella gets mocked. It's irritating to watch, but I could easily see book Bella acting that way. Similarly, Rob's Edward is so closed and sullen at times that people wonder if he's even trying. But I see Angst-ward as not outwardly expressing his feelings. Still, if the leading stars' acting detracts from a lot of people's enjoyment of the movies, it is going to hurt their view of the franchise as a whole.

Let's not forget the various scenes where the audience is laughing at the movie rather than with it. Two scenes stick out in my mind. The biology scene in the first movie where everyone thought Edward looked constipated. And Bella and Edward's sparkly romp through the woods in Alice's vision in New Moon. Even the director now says he wishes he hadn't done that scene. Monumentally bad scenes often linger in people's minds far longer than great ones.

I happen to be very fond of the movies, but I am also biased towards liking them. If I was not a Twilight fan, the movies' issues might well steer me away from the series.

Overall

This is a hard one. I want to say undoubtedly that the movies have benefited the Twilight franchise, because I love the movies. But they are so controversial and so overhyped that they detract from the books. The films do their best to translate the books, but they only touch the surface of the characters and plots. The movies aren't great and some of the ridicule is deserved; however, at the macro level, I don't know how or whether they could have been better. In some ways, the films emphasize the imperfections of the Twilight novels.

I lean slightly towards the "helped" side for my first point alone - the movies have brought millions of people to the books. They have definitely created enemies of the franchise, but there is something to the saying "any publicity is good publicity." One happy new reader outweighs a dozen disgruntled filmgoers.

What do you think? Have the Twilight movies helped or hurt the books

14 comments :

  1. I think I'd have to say both. It may have caused a lot more people to try the books (plus) but the flaws are a minus. I don't care for Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson's acting and the special effects were horrible in the first film (not to mention that terrible "spider monkey" line. I haven't reread the books since I saw the movies. I want to but I do not want to imagine Kristen and Rob as Bella and Edward when I do! What I liked about the movies was that I finally found the whole Bella-Edward-Jacob triangle to be a little believable. In the books, I thought Jacob seemed so much younger than Bella that it was ridiculous and that it never seemed that she cared that much for him. In the New Moon film, you can see that spark of possibility and I am grateful to the films for that (though there is that cheesy moment in the kitchen when Jacob almost kisses her where the script writer shouldn't have had him say that one line).

    I think I kind of prefer the movies to the books in certain instances. It is nice to not only be in Bella's head. I also think Bella has slightly more personality in the movies. She can even be a little sarcastic. Kristen's acting could be improved upon but at least Bella is not the flat character that I remember from the books.

    I think in the end, I'd agree that the movies help a little more than they hurt the series. Excellent post! You made some great points :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. For me, the movies definitely hurt the books. I finished all the books before the movies started, so I had pretty well-defined ideas about how each character looked/acted.

    In terms of visuals, I think the casting was done really well. But I didn't picture Bella so sullen - she was clumsy and awkward, but mostly happy (especially once her and Edward were together). In the movies I find she almost looks in pain when she shares moments with Edward, and that ruins my image of her from the books.

    Same for Edward. I figured he'd be a little more brooding then Bella, being over 100 years old and all, but I imagined that she would make him lighten up over time, and I pictured more and more of his scenes with him being lighter and happier; that's definitely not the case in the movies.

    I definitely agree with Christina T that the love triangle was much more believable in the movies, but I didn't like Jacob in the books so I was glad that I didn't feel like Bella cared for him in that way. New Moon angered me so much, I almost didn't finish the series. It was one of the books that I threw across the room once I had finished.

    I'd be interested to see how I felt if I were to re-read the books...

    Kelly @ Radiant Shadows

    ReplyDelete
  3. so agree with everyone here ..I don't think the movies helped but they didn't hurt. I didn't like Kristen was cast and didn't know Robert was til they started filming.

    I haven't reread the books in a while and I prefer the books over the movies at times because more details.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think it's pretty equal. Anything that gets as popular as Twilight is going to have people that hate it or think it's cool to hate on people who like it anyway.

    I really do like Twilight and am glad people are so enthusiastic about it but sometimes the screaming hoards do beg to be picked on.

    So the movies have helped and hurt. But honestly, I wouldn't have it any other way. Without Twilight translating so popularly into movies we probably wouldn't be getting all the other movies coming out. Plus, I actually really like the movies!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with both options, but I have re-read all the books numerously after watching the movies. It's a tough call! :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Alison darling the movie is AMAZING!! I was in the cinema yesterday watching Breaking Dawn and OMG OMG! SO SO GOOD ;)

    ReplyDelete
  7. From a completely personal perspective...I would say that the movies hurt the books. I have not read the books despite personal recommendations because although the movies are...entertaining in their own way...they do not make me interested to read the books.

    Prom a more balanced perspective I would say that it's a mixed bag! I am sure that just like the HP series...tons of kids/teens have been turned on to reading b/c of the movies...and that's a wonderful thing!

    ♥ Melissa @ Melissa's Eclectic Bookshelf

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think it depends that a movie can hurt or help a movie. I think Twilight has definitely open up door to reader. I now know more teens reading more because of the movie. Which is great!

    I think the real haters are the ...husbands! LOL

    My husband always says,"I can't believe I am jealous of a person who is just black and white." LOL, loved the post.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think it depends. If you read the book before the movies came out, I think it hurt them. Yes, the movies bring the books to life, but the movies are so badly adapted and acted that it just ruins it. I'm a little biased too because most of my Twilight friends started hating the books after the movies came out, which really dampened my spirits.

    If you saw the movie first, then I think it definitely helped the books. So many people wanted to read the books after that, which made them even more popular.

    And, yes, while more haters cropped up after the first movie came out, there were haters before. There just weren't as many of them. I think the movies just deepened that hate because more people started to like the books and because of all the crazy stories about the cougars who stalked the actors. *rolls eyes*

    ReplyDelete
  10. I personally think its amazing that so many people got hooked and were READING. I saw people who ive never seen open a book -read twilight. I thought it was incredible. If movies ( no matter what quality) have that effect on people, then bring it on!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great book choices, I loved bloodlines.... there are so many books to pick from... Book Savvy Babe’s FF

    ReplyDelete
  12. Objectively speaking, I think the movies helped: more people heard about Twilight read the books and perhaps became regular readers. However, personally, I look at the movies just as an addition to the books. I definitely prefer the books, because my vision of the characters was quite different and I am also bothered by acting and some structural things (scene omissions and additions).

    ReplyDelete
  13. "Kristin in particular looks almost exactly as I envisioned Bella"

    Me too! My sister doesn't like the casting, but I think Kristen was the perfect Bella. I don't actually like Kristin or her acting in the movies, but I thought she nailed the role of awkward Bella (who I also don't really like much). Ditto with Edward/Rob (although I really wish he were hotter. Same with Jacob).

    The movies are corny and sometimes even kinda lame, but so are the books. But the movies are fun and entertaining, also just like the books. I wasn't a die hard fan of the books, so the movies didn't disappoint me and I actually like them just as much.

    My biggest complaint about the movies is their hair! WHAT were they thinking with Jasper's hair??? And Carlisle's? Ack, and I know Alice's haircut is fitting for her character, but it does the actress no favors. Rosalie and Emmett didn't look how I pictured them, but they both grew on me pretty quickly.

    I love Jasper's voice though. Oh swoon. I just blur my eyes a little so I don't see that awful hair and his hotness totally makes up for Edward's constipation and Jacob's baby face.

    I don't know if the movies helped or hurt the books overall, but for me they helped a lot. It's a lot easier to pop in one of the movies and refresh myself on the story and it helps keep a firmer visual in my mind. I think they complement each other nicely.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I sooo agree. I love verything you said here. Spot on!

    ReplyDelete

I love comments. I appreciate every one! Thank you in advance.

This blog is now an award free zone. I just don't have time to pass on the awards as they deserve.

 
Template: Blog Designs by Sheila